Polls in the US (http://news.antiwar.com/2013/05/01/reuters-poll-americans-strongly-opposed-to-attacking-syria/) and UK (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/01/syria-hague-arms-intervention-military) show that the broad majority of the public is against an intervention in Syria. Now it turns out that this also applies to the majority of Turks:
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/06/turkey-erdogan-syria-policy-qusair.html

So, whom are the democratically elected leaders Obama, Cameron and Erdogan representing when they push for an attack on Syria?

Have they degraded themselves to be the „foreign secretaries“ of Saudi Arabia and Qatar?

Here is what the public of Syrias arab neighbours think:
http://angryarab.net/2013/05/01/finally-somebody-bothered-to-ask-what-arabs-want-this-proves-yet-again-that-preferences-of-arab-rulers-are-not-the-same-by-the-people/